I am in the Instructional Technology and Media program, this is my second semester. I also work full time at Gartner, which is an IT research company in Connecticut. I am a web usage analyst, I help our business units evaluate and assess the effectiveness of our websites and make product development decisions based on usage metrics, usability studies and surveys. Previously I was a producer at Gartner and was responsible for working with the business owners, designers and developers to build new site sections and features.
My interests lie in taking my producer/web analytics/user experience skills and applying them to the development of educational software. I'm very passionate about the idea of developing new learning environments that give educational self determinism back to students to make them feel empowered. This class appealed to me because I wanted to get deep understanding of what software is being used in the marketplace today, how it is being used, and the benefits and shortcomings of each.
I have taken some online course, mainly training courses through Gartner, which have been fairly static. Watch a video, click to the next screen and answer some questions. Very dry stuff. I've "taken" courses on Academic Earth, which entails watching a video that was recorded of a traditional class. I've used podcasts and webcasts and interactive meetings. This is the first online class at TC I've taken, and the first of this style with weekly assignments and interactions. This semester I am also taking Cognition and Learning online and I'm anxious to see how the structure of these two courses are similar or differ.
Recently I started using Rosetta Stone software. My grandfather used to teach me Italian when I was a kid. In junior high and high school I took three years of Spanish and in high school and college I took three years of Italian. With all that time I'm still not conversational in either language. I've always wanted to be able to speak Italian fluently, so I finally took the dive and got Rosetta Stone. It's a really interesting approach they use, it's very intuitive and they manage to teach concepts like masculine and feminine words and singular and plural words almost by example instead of telling or explaining. I like it a lot and I think it's very clever how they've set it up. But what really floored me was what happened when my kids each started using it. I waited in the wings expecting that they would ask for help and have questions. I thought the software was intuitive to me because of the background I already had, but to my surprise, it appeared that it was just as intuitive for my kids. At eight and nine, they've had some exposure to Italian, but nothing formal or comprehensive. Nevertheless, they're doing wonderfully! Who knows, by the time we get back to Italy over the summer, maybe we'll all be fluent!
In addition to working on my Italian, I'm trying to remember to put my researcher hat on and observe how my kids interact with the software and make note of strengths and weaknesses. I'll share any interesting discoveries I come upon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Very cool tech oriented background it appears. It will be great to hear your views on issues.
ReplyDeleteI've heard good things about Rosetta. If given enough time, do you really think you guys could become fluent only using it? That's great if you can. I know you will master semantics and syntax with it, but does rosetta help with conversation too? I have always thought that in order to learn a language, you had to just get out there and speak it and speak it and speak it.
ReplyDeleteI often think about the challenges of getting conversational elements into self-driven language packages. They couldn't replace native speaking conversation partners, but what could they do?
Ciao
So far, I've only been through the level I Italian. There is still level II and III to go.
ReplyDeleteI had always believed that the only way I'd become fluent would be to spend a summer in Italy. I can tell you from past trips that though I have a good vocabulary, it's hard to translate that to actually speaking to people.
I think/hope that the program and the speaking that you do in the program will serve as good preparation. I think it will make it easier to translate what you have learned to actual "on the ground" application. And once over that hurdle, becoming conversational in that immersed environment should happen more quickly... I'll let you know if it works out that way in July! ;)
We have a few of the same interests. I'm very interested in your tech experiences and your views on educational materials. Rosetta has caught my attention, as well, but more because I feel guilty for allowing my French to crumble from non-use. I'll be interested in learning more about how you and your children do with the Rosetta!
ReplyDeleteI heard a lot of good things about Rosetta as well. I never use it though. I'll be interested in how you and your children do with Rosetta as well.
ReplyDelete